If you want to get myth2ipod working on Ubuntu (assuming you have both MythTV and Ubuntu installed) there aren’t any instructions to my knowledge. I found the currently posted set of instructions to be outdated (last update 3/5/06). The following, updated instructions are actually much simpler (everything is in apt).
I did as follows (Myth .20, Ubuntu 7.04):
- Get the appropriate version of ffmpeg (with xvid support). To do that, add this line to your /etc/apt/sources.list file:
deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ feisty free non-free
and then run
wget -q http://packages.medibuntu.org/medibuntu-key.gpg -O- | sudo apt-key add - && sudo apt-get update
Then install your brand new version of ffmpeg:
sudo apt-get install ffmpeg
(found that tip linked from here)
- To test what you did in step 1, run
ffmpeg -version and make sure you see ‘enable-xvid’ and ‘enable-faac’ in the output.
- Install the codec library, which is required to make sure you can encode aac audio.
sudo apt-get install libavcodec0d
To test that you can, run
ffmpeg -formats and make sure you see
DEA aac listed under “Codecs”.
- Install mp4box, which is available in apt under ‘gpac’
sudo apt-get install gpac
- Grab nuvexport:
tar -xjvf nuvexport-latest.tar.bz2
sudo mv nuvexport-0.4 /usr/local/share/nuvexport
- Copy down the scripts and put them in the right places:
sudo mv myth2ipod.txt /usr/local/bin/myth2ipod
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/myth2ipod
sudo mv iPod.pm /usr/local/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/iPod.pm
sudo ln -s /usr/local/share/nuvexport/nuvexport /usr/local/bin/nuvexport
- At this point you can follow the rest of the instructions at the site for editing /usr/local/bin/myth2ipod , etc. The rest of it is not distribution-specific. The slight change I had to make was the path to MP4Box which is hard-coded in the script to point to /usr/local/bin but on Ubuntu it gets put into /usr/bin.
An article I probably only like because it re-affirms my own decisions.
Shares have been remarkably consistent over the past two centuries in their 7% real returns. In Jeremy Siegel’s book “Stocks for the Long Run,” he finds that real returns averaged 7% over nearly seven decades ending in 1870, then 6.6% through 1925 and then 6.9% through 2004.
The average real return for houses over long periods might surprise you: It’s virtually zero.
If you like movies and/or British comedy, I’d strongly recommend adding Mark Kermode’s podcast to your iPod. I’ve listened to it for several months, and it’s one of my favorites. It’s a half-hour snippet of a longer radio show hosted by Simon Mayo in which, every Friday, Kermode comes in to review films.
They review the movies that are newly released in England, which largely correspond to the US but occasionally they review movies that aren’t out here yet, or review movies that came out here several months ago. Kermode is famous for his rants, and he and Mayo have a great chemistry. It’s very entertaining.
One note about his reviews which is absolutely true (excerpted from Wikipedia):
His emphasis on genre cinema has also meant he often expresses a liking for films panned by other critics, such as Basic Instinct 2 or Lassie because they follow genre expectations.
A few of us at work were trying to figure out why Apple released Safari for Windows yesterday. We came up with a number of reasons against it:
- It doesn’t (directly) make them any money.
- It does cost them money. Aside from the up front costs of producing it, they’ll now enter the (endless) cycle of patching holes that allow people to exploit Windows.
- Firefox is the most popular competitor to Internet Explorer, and it seems to have been stuck at the 15% penetration mark for some time now.
- If you think there’s room for a browser that touts itself as being “really fast” but has lackluster support for 3rd party extensions, maybe you should have taken a look at Opera‘s success on the desktop. (below 1%)
But, of course, Apple also announced the the “API” for building iPhone applications will be Safari. So, that changed the game a little bit. Some reasons for putting Safari on Windows:
- Legitimize the iPhone’s development platform. If it works in Safari, it doesn’t just work on the Mac, it also works on Windows, and on the iPhone.
- Allow iPhone developers to develop on Windows. It’s a theory, although if that’s all they wanted, they wouldn’t need to bundle Safari with iTunes – they could just offer it as a download from their developer site.
- Foster “the switch.” If I’m on a Windows PC and I use iTunes for my music, and Safari to surf the web and use a variety of web apps, maybe next time I buy a computer I’ll just get a Mac which has those familiar things on it.
- Give them an avenue for pushing web standards. If they’re looking to extend web standards to provide for things like, perhaps, special mobile-based extensions, this again gives them a more legitimate/widespread platform for doing so.
I’m not thrilled, being a web developer, at having yet another browser-OS combination to have to test on. I also don’t think that it will be a successful/popular browser on Windows. I hardly even use it on my Mac (I prefer Firefox, in large part due to extensions). But, I’m interested to see what happens with it. Anyone else have some good theories?
I’m a bit concerned at the fact that the Rails community is relying more heavily on plugins to deliver functionality than building that functionality into Rails. It’s a good idea on paper, but in practice you’ll find that it’s not uncommon for two plugins to stomp on each other. The asset_packager and distributed_assets plugins both override the
compute_public_path method in Rails, and step on each other. There’s a similar story with the conditional_cache plugin and the caching-plugin.
Fortunately for me, in all of these cases, Rails core decided the features that these plugins provide are worth including in core and some form of them will be in Rails 2.0. I can only imagine that the proliferation of plugins is going to bring up this problem again and again, however. Because Ruby is a dynamic language, you practically get a plugin architecture for free. The problem is that it’s totally unstructured, and people can clobber one another’s methods at will.
I don’t know yet. It’s not back on a daily basis, but I bought a domain yesterday, sold one today, and started to breathe some life back into it (upgraded Typo, picked a new theme).
The iPhone Ads are out – I first started seeing them on TV during the Red Sox-Yankees game last night. My first reaction: the finger motion required to navigate around the UI is very… effeminate. I’m not sure if it will become a common method for interacting with hardware -like the motion for interacting with the iPod’s clickwheel- but I think it’s distinctive enough that it will at least attract attention (good or bad).
Can somebody make this happen?
A basic 15″ MacBook Pro has 2GB of RAM, a 120GB 5400 RPM hard drive, and an 2.33GHz Core 2 Duo for $2500.
You can get a T61 Thinkpad with 4GB of RAM, a 100GB 7200RPM hard drive, and a 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo for $2300. Plus it has a higher screen resolution, and (reportedly) much longer battery life.
The only bummer about the ThinkPad is the OS.